Bible Engagement Project App + Resources

Controversial topic Tempted vs Tested, but I believe it points us to freedom from sin. 

Tempted - entice or attempt to entice (someone) to do or acquire something that they find attractive but know to be wrong or not beneficial.

Tested - take measures to check the quality, performance, or reliability of (something), especially before putting it into widespread use or practice.

The best answer is at the bottom of my post.

Psalms say: “those who put hope in Him, will not sin” (Psalm 34:22; 1 John 3:6).

James 1:13 When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone; 14 but each person is tempted when they are dragged away by their own evil desire and enticed.

Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.  

The Lie - Dangers of AI?
James 1:13 states that God cannot be tempted, nor does He tempt anyone. However, the Gospels record that Jesus was tempted by Satan. This apparent contradiction is reconciled by understanding that Jesus, as a man, was subject to human temptation, while His divine nature as God was not.

The Lie - Dangers of AI?
Reconciling the Two:
The key to reconciling these two truths lies in understanding the hypostatic union of Jesus Christ, who was both fully God and fully man. His humanity, which was subject to temptation, was distinct from His divine nature, which is not susceptible to evil.

Testing vs. Tempting:
Some theologians distinguish between testing (which God may allow) and tempting (which God never does). While God may allow trials in life to test faith and encourage growth, He never leads anyone into sin.

Truth?
The Lord was tempted by the Satan who thought Him to be only a man. Indeed, He was and is man, fully, 100% so, but at the same time He is God, so Lord Jesus Christ's best appellation is "God-man". Since He has only one divine Personality of Logos who got incarnated in human nature, or who adopted human nature, then it is impossible for Him to fall into any sin and thus ontologically impossible for Satan to succeed in his trial to seduce Him to a sin.

The same is true with His tempter humans, who, unfortunately, more often than not are even more stupid and vile than demons, with an only salutary difference that in difference from those hapless fallen angels, they can still repent: humans tempted the Lord, trying to stone Him by asking provocative, trap-questions (like: "should we give tribute to Caesar?" or "what should we do with this prostitute?" etc.), and in each such occasion the Lord flew over the trap as a dove. The pharisees thought that they tempted the Lord, but He was not tempted by this, being the Lord and the only knower of human hearts along with the Father and the Holy Ghost. If you want to sally the sun-rays and throw mud at them, will the sun rays be sallied? How much less could the Lord be tempted by idiots, either demons or humans?!

Just think: does not temptation entail a possibility and an inclination to sinning? I guess it does. Now, did the Lord Jesus Christ have an inclination to sinning, I speak about the eternal Logos who took on Him the entirety of human nature without sin? Now, the expression "without sin" means also without inclination to sinning, does not it? Yes it does. Therefore, He could not be tempted in the sense of any possibility for sinning. When He was offered by Satan worldly pleasures and powers, or when Jews offered Him political kingship, He, unlike men, did not have to overcome any sinful inclination so as to avoid damaging soul for the sake of holding power, or having millions of dollars, or having free sex with any girl or woman with impunity, as anyone among us would have had. Even in usual men, if a man has an allergy on alcohol so as to be unable even to stand its remote smell, can anybody tempt and seduce such a man by an attraction of an alcoholic beverage, wine or vodka? Impossible, for such a man will be immune from such a temptation. How much more, no, how incomparably and transcendentally more the Lord was immune from any sinful inclination to be tempted!

Thus, He was tempted in a futile way, but still He used this futility for educational purpose teaching humans to a) care primarily for Eternal Bread of the divine word and not only for a physically nutritive transient bread; b) not to tempt God, but act according to reason and conscience in Holy Spirit and c) not to covet for earthly power and pleasures at detriment of soul, for there is nothing in this world that can be even worthy of the health of soul, which is when it is an undefiled temple of the Holy Spirit.

The Lord Jesus was stupidly tempted, or better to say, thought to be tempted by Satan, but could not be seduced, being God; on the contrary, we can be tempted and seduced, but in Him and through Him even we, simple men, can withstand and overcome temptation, for as

Psalms say: “those who put hope in Him, will not sin” (Psalm 34:22).

So, to answer this question: the Lord was tempted on the part of the tempters - Satan, demons and vile men - yet Himself was not tempted in the sense of having any tiny dot of propensity to sinning, for He had none, because while having adopted human nature, He adopted it fully save its infectedness with sin, which means that He had neither sin nor any sinful inclination. Human nature, as being created, can be tempted and seduced, but not the Lord's human nature, for it belongs to the Person of the eternal Logos, God-the Son, and this Person not only does not but cannot either sin or be infected by a desire to sin. Thus, all His tempters and seducers were thinking they had really put before Him a real opportunity to sinning, and in this they were utterly, outlandishly stupid.